Meet Constantine – Find Mythos-level vulnerabilities in your code. It proves them, patches them, PRs them back. Autonomously.

Download Datasheet
Praetorian Guard / Breach and Attack Simulation

Breach and Attack Simulation

Did anything catch it?

Simulation is only useful against techniques that apply to you.

Guard re-detonates the chains it already proved in your environment, then queries CrowdStrike, Defender, or Splunk to ask what surfaced. What comes back is a MITRE ATT&CK® gap analysis of the TTPs your stack missed.

Not a library of generic adversary behavior. The attacks that actually worked against you, run against the tools you bought to catch them.

Start with one domain
See the Guard platform
Example replay · one proven attack chain
9
TTPs executed in the replayed chain
7
ran clean, with no detection in your stack
2
surfaced in EDR telemetry, one alerted

What is breach and attack simulation?

Breach and attack simulation (BAS) runs real attacker techniques inside your environment to test whether your security controls detect and stop them. Results are typically mapped to MITRE ATT&CK so you can see which techniques your stack missed.
Praetorian Guard runs breach and attack simulation against attack chains its agents and operators already proved exploitable in your environment, then checks your EDR and SIEM to show which steps were detected.
BAS vs. point products

Point products are inputs. Guard is the outcome.

Every category below is something an operator needs on the way to an answer. None of them is the answer. Guard runs them as modules, or ingests the ones you already own, and uses them to find where you actually get compromised.
The line item
What it gives you today
What Guard does with it
Breach and attack simulation
Theoretical techniques that flood the SOC
Guard re-runs the chains it actually proved on you and reads your EDR telemetry to show what you caught.
USE OURS
Guard ships every one of these capabilities itself. Consolidate the stack and cancel what it makes redundant.
OR BRING YOUR OWN
Keep the tools you have renewed and plug them in through over 80 integrations. Guard does not care where an input comes from, only whether it survives proof.
Operator-validated BAS

Agents run the operation. Operators own the result.

Praetorian has been running offensive engagements for over a decade. Guard is that tradecraft written into code, and the same operators still review what comes out of it. An exploited finding gets operator review before it reaches you. When something needs a signature for a board, an auditor, or a customer security review, a Praetorian operator signs it.
Guard interrogates the environment for what actually is, mapped to NIST CSF and FDA today, with ISO 27001 and PCI coming.
OPERATOR REVIEW
Exploited findings are reviewed by the people who wrote the tradecraft
NAMED ATTESTATION
A human signs what your auditor and your board receive
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT INCLUDED
Human-led, on your dates, inside the same subscription
Related Guard capabilities

The rest of the platform

Attack Surface Management

Start with a domain. See what an adversary would find.

Explore attack surface management →
Vulnerability Management

A finding is a claim until something exploits it.

Explore vulnerability management →
Continuous Penetration Testing

A target and an objective. Everything else is a dial.

Explore continuous pen testing →
Threat Intelligence

A CVE drops. Guard already knows if it touches you.

Explore threat intelligence →
Continuous Threat Exposure Management

Exposure management that proves what is exploitable.

Explore CTEM →
FAQ

Breach and attack simulation questions

Breach and attack simulation (BAS) runs real attacker techniques inside your environment to test whether your security controls detect and stop them. Results are typically mapped to MITRE ATT&CK so you can see which techniques your stack missed.

Most BAS tools run a generic library of adversary behavior. Guard re-detonates the attack chains it already proved exploitable in your environment, so every simulation reflects a technique that has worked against you.

After each replay, Guard queries your detection stack, including CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender XDR, and Splunk Enterprise Security, to see which techniques surfaced in telemetry and which raised an alert.

A MITRE ATT&CK gap analysis of the replayed chain. Each technique is marked as ran clean with no detection, surfaced in telemetry, or alerted, so detection engineering knows exactly where to focus.

No. In Guard, the two work together. Continuous penetration testing proves which attack chains are exploitable, and BAS replays those chains to test whether your defenses catch them.

Start on Guard Free with a single domain and no integration work, or request a month-long free pilot run against your own environment.

Pilots and free access

If the point of your program is to keep people like us out, get our perspective on it.

Month-long free pilots, funded with AI tokens, run against your own environment. See what a fleet of offensive agents finds before someone less friendly does. Or start on Guard Free with a single domain and no integration work.
Start with one domain
Start a pilot
Or watch the 42-minute walkthrough
Get started

Get started with Guard

Watch Guard work a real attack surface end to end: discovery, validation, and exploitation, with the operators who run it. Then point it at one of your own domains for free.